<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
  <channel>
    <title>Street Catchments on Podaris: Blog</title>
    <link>https://blog.podaris.com/tags/street-catchments/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Street Catchments on Podaris: Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 06:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="https://blog.podaris.com/tags/street-catchments/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Bristol vs Utrecht: twice the cycleway, but what does street-based accessibility analysis tell us?</title>
      
      
        
      
      <link>https://blog.podaris.com/bristol-utrecht-cycling/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://blog.podaris.com/bristol-utrecht-cycling/</guid>
      <description>Almost every active travel strategy published in Britain since about 2015 has contained a photograph of the Netherlands. Usually a station bike park, occasionally a canal, always with the implication that if we just built enough kilometres of cycleway we too could have a city where the school run happens on a cargo bike. Councils report their kilometres, national rankings count them, Active Travel England asks for them, and the number goes up every year, which is lovely.</description>
      
        
        
        
        
        
        <enclosure url="https://blog.podaris.com//img/bristol-utrecht/hero.jpg" length='\U0003fc23' type="image/jpeg" />
      
      </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>